In its Pragmatismo workmanship, Philosophy of the Creation and the Change it points with respect to a possible cause of the fragility of the argument politics when if he searchs a philosophical base for the positioning detaching as well as vain the fight for the exclusive argument of a position politics. ' ' In particular the ones that are the left of the specter politician they nourish the hope to find a perspective philosophical who cannot be used by the right politics, a philosophy that is exclusively the service of noble causes. But this perspective does not go to never exist therefore any philosophical perspective is only one tool that can be used for many different hands. ' ' (Pragmatismo, Philosophy of the Creation and the Change Richard Rorty Organizadores; Cristina Magro and Antonio Landmarks Pear tree. Belo Horizonte. Publishing company UFMG, 2000 ) How much when uncurling of the proposal of abandonment of the search for the redentora truth, uncurling of this encloses two scopes, the first one says respect to leave any pretension of historical authority, and as it says respect to the possibilities to interpret the term progress. In the next lines I will dissertarei concerning these two scopes. How much to abandon the pretension of historical authority, we can try to understand this as that authority that Rashnilhkov it described as proper of historical figures destined to invent the humanity.
This authority excuses to its possessors the possibility to ignore next apelos a time that if they see as answering to one I appeal greater and – the historical one. In such a way we would hinder radical positionings that could generate unnecessary suffering. The proper Rorty explains that we would also lose possibility to demonstrate that our enemies are missed in the way as they act, would lose the possibility to point as wrong positionings of figures as Hitler, Stalin and republicans.