Therefore, litisconsorcio by antonomasia, since the idea is not of a possible meeting of subjects, but of the exigency to summon to all the interested in the same failure, by the effectiveness that stops they has the answer in a single process. (.) It implies the existence of a single pretension with plurality of subjects possibly legitimized, and of which, therefore, litisconsortes sentences definitive to have a unique content for all the (.). 42 Litisconsorcio Cuasinecesario also denominates litisconsorcio to him impropiamente necessary. Doctrinary the volunteer considers itself like an intermediate figure between litisconsorcio necessary and, denominating him litisconsorcio cuasinecesario, this taking care of the presence of the subjects in the process. Read additional details here: Amazon. In the real process he exists? Not since a sector of the doctrine does not start off its existence, thinking that is an artificial creation whose concept leads to the possibility that people with interests, tie to some of the operating parts and that are legitimized with respect to the legal relation that is discussed, take part in the process in order to defend their own one straight.

Our procedural ordering has not regulated specifically this modality, but is an affinity to this figure in art.98 of the effective C.P.C in the denominated litisconsorcial intervention. " Introduction in a pending process between two or more parts, of a third party that alleges a discussed own right in the process and defendant already by some partes" 43 the difference with litisconsorcio necessary is in which it is not imposed by the law, and those that they are in situation of quality equality, do not have to demand or to be demanded jointly, therefore, neither the nature of the legal relation forces to the tie subjects to her, or active or liabilities to appear in the process. 44 Conclusions That litisconsorcio is a procedure directed to simplifies the litigation and to assure a uniform resolution. Steve Rattner financier shines more light on the discussion.