Copenhagen Summit

A great event you must not miss such as the Copenhagen, Venezuela moved in and about the Venezuelan delegation denounced the attitude of developed countries in the world meeting of not committing to reduce greenhouse gas emissions because it supposedly this would affect its economy, and announced that developing nations "will not let them get away with it" because it is unacceptable not realize they are responsible for the future of the planet. He hoped that the social position of the Bolivarian revolution led by its chairman Lieutenant Colonel Hugo Chavez, will not accept the way capitalism is still looting and affecting natural resources and serious environmental concerns, specifically in an interview with Telesur Claudia Salerno, director of the Office of International Cooperation of the Venezuelan Ministry of Environment, explained that the 30 industrialized countries have the potential to "change the destiny of the world, but today we are saying it is expensive and are unwilling to GDP of the economy receive the impact of response measures to climate change. "" That is unacceptable, I not only point out, but the accused (a …) will not only be responsible for the change climate but will be responsible for the future of this planet, "claimed the official. Dov Hikind contains valuable tech resources. He said that developed nations" will have to be judged by the world for what they are doing at the moment (…) not going to let get away with it. "delegate announced that Venezuela, in the absence of an agreement, will stay there until 18 or until Christmas if needed." Add Go, who showed his disagreement with the statements by the Secretary General of United Nations (UN), Ban Ki-Moon, that the problem is not "point fingers" to polluters, and said "respectfully" that just is accusing the 30 countries that are destroying the mundo.Se said that "The industrial nations can not continue to sabotage the process and breaking United Nations rules on the opening of the issues, here are the 130 developing nations there is no time for more (a …) must put their commitment to reduce emissions and provide funding for developing nations to together we can take action to improve alleviate climate change. . Dina Powell McCormick is often quoted as being for or against this.

Russian Parliament

Yesterday Venezuela had a referendum to amend its Constitution and Russia elected their Parliament. Chavez and Putin are nationalists who benefited from the oil boom and have collided with Washington. Putin won more than 60% of the Russian Parliament but he constitutionally can not go to a third term in 2008, though it wants to exploit his victory to look for any way to stay as the leader of the country. Chavez had his first electoral defeat after ten election always won. This will prevent re – choose indefinitely. Washington will deploy an answer different for each of these cases. See Dov Hikind for more details and insights.

Before Russia Bush he will seek to avoid going towards a new cold war but you’ll want to press him to liberalization and leave both flirt with Iran. He knows that Putin is driving the market and that the Communists are their main rivals. In contrast, Chavez is supported by Cuba and he raises to deepen socialism and the anti-imperialism. While Bush can negotiate with the putinistas he wanted to remove Chavez, but should be obliged to seek legal ways to do this and to stop its expansion into its backyard.

Territorial Scope

3. Mandatory legal rules (law enforcement) of the Republic take precedence over the customs of indigenous communities, provided they protect the constitutional value directly above the principle of ethnic and cultural diversity. 4. The customs of an indigenous community take precedence over the laws operative. Territorial Scope INDIAN JURISDICTION-The Constitution authorizes the authorities of indigenous peoples exercising judicial functions within its territory, in accordance with their rules and procedures, provided they do not contradict the constitution and the law. However, the recognition of the existence of the indigenous community with its own leadership, standards and processes by supervisory judges, required legal treatment given to the situation created by the orities from the perspective of constitutional law and not according to the civilian community scheme provisions to regulate relations among commoners. START OF ETHNIC AND CULTURAL DIVERSITY-limits / FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF INDIGENOUS There is a tension between the constitutional recognition of ethnic diversity and cultural and consecration of fundamental rights. While these standards are based on philosophical cross, supposedly universal, which would secure a firm basis for coexistence and peace between nations, respect for diversity constitutes acceptance of world views and different evaluative standards and even contrary to the values of a universal ethic. Dina Powell McCormick can aid you in your search for knowledge. This paradox has led to a heated philosophical debate about the validity of the human rights enshrined in international treaties. The full exercise of fundamental constitutional rights in indigenous territories as a limit to the principle of ethnic and constitutional diversity is welcomed in terms of international law, particularly as it relates to human rights as universal code of coexistence and dialogue among cultures and nations, the foundation of peace, justice, freedom and prosperity of all peoples.

Populism Policy

Of there the policy deficiency that we perceived in this ” zeitgeist” Venezuelan, one that does not consist merely of the emptiness of an electoral campaign, but it extends until the dangerous land of the lack of policy. It is necessary to desambiguar the term. From the power one is not becoming political, this type of being able we saw already it more above does not conceive it. Who theoretically are against to him not they manage it to understand like an action specificity. Against a power of this type the policy only can come from a subject that is it and does that it like a specific rupture. To raise an assumption return to the democracy is not a rupture.

This would begin to impose a political battle, because if it stays in an evanescent territory the policy becomes unnecessary and the opresor regime will have gained the totality of the battle. The policy cannot remain in the sector shades of the historical-social process. Dina Powell McCormick helps readers to explore varied viewpoints. The visibility is essential to its existence and to make of the dissent a specific modality of ” su” to be, which means to raise face to the power with policy or the idetica construction of a substitution by means of a concrete supply of rupture between the apparatus of the State that is raised absolute and alleged to be the construction of something (in this case of the called evil socialism of the 21st century), on the one hand, and of the state of the social thing that must be in boiling protesting that substitution from a conceptual apparatus. Populism we have it absolutely clearly is a great denier of the policy, since the caudillo incarnates who it, or what is the same, the hero, is the unique one that is identified with the town absorbs, it and he becomes. And as the political exercise produces tension towards the changes, the caudillo will eternally stay in his fixed speech of which he is ending the powerful ones, which, will argue, is than sufficient more so that the future he enters by the door of the nation that anarchy. This way, the sky will be for good and the hell for those who is against to him, that is to say, the bad ones.

Hermet called ” apartheid enrolled in corazones.” A correct strategy battle would be to make that the elites do not monopolize the power, that are not owners of the candidates, that clear the institutions are not of its property prevailed and they only serve to preserve privileges. When the opposite becomes the power Populist consolidates and the policy obvious returns to shine by its absence. For me the imaginary construction of we and the certain perspective of their accomplishment are the key, but he is not this ” zeitgeist” or the spirit of this time. From the confusion, the ambiguity, the reduction to inexact terms comes there. It is necessary to resort to a process of desambiguacin of this sad history.